accessiBe’s industry reports are built on original research, combining survey data, expert insight, and collaboration with disability community organizations. Each study connects compliance, digital operations, and user impact across complex environments.
Can students (or prospective students) access this content as part of instruction, enrollment, or required services?
Examples generally outside scope:
Why this matters:
Title II applies to programs, services, and activities provided to the public, which in higher education includes students and applicants — not internal operations.
Does this content allow the public to:
Examples that usually qualify as “in scope”:
Is this content part of:
Indicators content is “current”:
Is it:
Important clarification:
“Old” does not automatically mean “archived.”
If the public still relies on it, it is not exempt.
Can the public access the same information or complete the same requirement in an accessible way?
Examples of acceptable alternatives:
Would fixing this require significant difficulty or expense relative to agency resources?
Key clarification:
Undue burden depends on the situation and your available resources. It is not a permanent exception or a blanket reason to avoid remediation.
Have you documented:
DOJ expectations focus heavily on whether agencies can show reasoned decision-making, not perfection.
This content appears to fall within ADA Title II requirements and should be prioritized before April 2026. The good news: you don’t have to navigate this alone. <b>accessiBe supports government organizations with scalable, defensible accessibility solutions.</b>
This content may not require immediate remediation. However, Title II still applies to active public-facing digital services. The good news: you don’t have to guess where you stand. <b>Run a scan to see how your website performs against accessibility standards.</b>
